<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Vidize.com</title>
	<link>http://www.vidize.com/blog</link>
	<description>Blogging about web video &#038; journalism</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 05:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Webcam for video production by Vidize Beta gear: web camera at Vidize.com</title>
		<link>http://www.vidize.com/blog/archives/webcam-production/#comment-56448</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vidize.com/blog/archives/webcam-production/#comment-56448</guid>
					<description>[...] Logitech Communicate STX: If you want a good budget web cam, the STX is an excellent choice. I own it myself and it does well even in low light. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Logitech Communicate STX: If you want a good budget web cam, the STX is an excellent choice. I own it myself and it does well even in low light. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Webcams: USB 1.1 vs 2.0 by Vidize Beta gear: web camera at Vidize.com</title>
		<link>http://www.vidize.com/blog/archives/webcams-usb-11-vs-20/#comment-56447</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vidize.com/blog/archives/webcams-usb-11-vs-20/#comment-56447</guid>
					<description>[...] A while back, there was a discussion about USB 1.1 vs USB 2.0 web cams. This discussion is mostly obsolete now as the majority of new web cameras are all USB 2.0. Keep in mind that being USB 2.0 doesn&amp;#8217;t guarantee quality in any way. It simply means the camera can send more data to the computer (in theory). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] A while back, there was a discussion about USB 1.1 vs USB 2.0 web cams. This discussion is mostly obsolete now as the majority of new web cameras are all USB 2.0. Keep in mind that being USB 2.0 doesn&#8217;t guarantee quality in any way. It simply means the camera can send more data to the computer (in theory). [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Russia and free speech by Gay rights in Russia at Vidize.com</title>
		<link>http://www.vidize.com/blog/archives/russia-and-free-speech/#comment-47077</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vidize.com/blog/archives/russia-and-free-speech/#comment-47077</guid>
					<description>[...] So let&amp;#8217;s recap Putin&amp;#8217;s priorities when it comes to free speech and human rights: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] So let&#8217;s recap Putin&#8217;s priorities when it comes to free speech and human rights: [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Russia and free speech by BBC correspondent still missing at Vidize.com</title>
		<link>http://www.vidize.com/blog/archives/russia-and-free-speech/#comment-47076</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vidize.com/blog/archives/russia-and-free-speech/#comment-47076</guid>
					<description>[...] Previous &amp;#8220;hotspots&amp;#8221; for journalists include Russia and Iraq. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Previous &#8220;hotspots&#8221; for journalists include Russia and Iraq. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on End to the writer&#8217;s strike? by Writers strike cost 2.5 billion at Vidize.com</title>
		<link>http://www.vidize.com/blog/archives/end-to-the-writers-strike/#comment-43242</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vidize.com/blog/archives/end-to-the-writers-strike/#comment-43242</guid>
					<description>[...] With the writers&amp;#8217; strike over, a real question emerges - how much did the strike cost? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] With the writers&#8217; strike over, a real question emerges - how much did the strike cost? [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Love Machinima by Review: Dragonlance: Dragons of Autumn Twilight at FilmDailies.com - A filmmaker&#8217;s blog</title>
		<link>http://www.vidize.com/blog/archives/love-machinima/#comment-41021</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 09:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vidize.com/blog/archives/love-machinima/#comment-41021</guid>
					<description>[...] Wow. This probably explains why the movie looks like a mess. I have seen WoW machinima&amp;#8217;s that are ten times better than this movie. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Wow. This probably explains why the movie looks like a mess. I have seen WoW machinima&#8217;s that are ten times better than this movie. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Unified theory of UGC by naisioxerloro</title>
		<link>http://www.vidize.com/blog/archives/unified-theory-of-ugc/#comment-33524</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vidize.com/blog/archives/unified-theory-of-ugc/#comment-33524</guid>
					<description>Hi. 
Good design, who make it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.<br />
Good design, who make it?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Next-gen Flash to support H.264 Video by Flash Media Server 3 announced at Vidize.com</title>
		<link>http://www.vidize.com/blog/archives/next-gen-flash-to-support-h264-video/#comment-21208</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 17:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vidize.com/blog/archives/next-gen-flash-to-support-h264-video/#comment-21208</guid>
					<description>[...] About          &amp;#171; Next-gen Flash to support H.264 Video [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] About          &laquo; Next-gen Flash to support H.264 Video [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft launches Silverlight by Next-gen Flash to support H.264 Video at Vidize.com</title>
		<link>http://www.vidize.com/blog/archives/microsoft-launches-silverlight/#comment-20022</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vidize.com/blog/archives/microsoft-launches-silverlight/#comment-20022</guid>
					<description>[...] I think Adobe&amp;#8217;s moving in the right direction at least in part because of the competitive pressure from Microsoft&amp;#8217;s Silverlight. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I think Adobe&#8217;s moving in the right direction at least in part because of the competitive pressure from Microsoft&#8217;s Silverlight. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on User-generated content by YouTube advertising ignores UGC at Vidize.com</title>
		<link>http://www.vidize.com/blog/archives/user-generated-content/#comment-19772</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 08:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vidize.com/blog/archives/user-generated-content/#comment-19772</guid>
					<description>[...] When Google introduced its ad model for YouTube, one could&amp;#8217;ve expected that ads will show up in ALL cat-and-dog fighting videos (a.k.a. user-generated content or UGC). Instead, it appears that Google&amp;#8217;s video ads will only show on videos supplied by the 3,000 professional content providers and 70 independent partner channels. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] When Google introduced its ad model for YouTube, one could&#8217;ve expected that ads will show up in ALL cat-and-dog fighting videos (a.k.a. user-generated content or UGC). Instead, it appears that Google&#8217;s video ads will only show on videos supplied by the 3,000 professional content providers and 70 independent partner channels. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
