<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Webcams: USB 1.1 vs 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vidize.com/blog/archives/webcams-usb-11-vs-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vidize.com/blog/archives/webcams-usb-11-vs-20/</link>
	<description>Record video interviews and dialogs online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:07:46 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vidize Beta gear: web camera at Vidize Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.vidize.com/blog/archives/webcams-usb-11-vs-20/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Vidize Beta gear: web camera at Vidize Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vidize.com/blog/archives/speed-usb-11-vs-20/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>[...] while back, there was a discussion about USB 1.1 vs USB 2.0 web cams. This discussion is mostly obsolete now as the majority of new web cameras are all USB 2.0. Keep in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] while back, there was a discussion about USB 1.1 vs USB 2.0 web cams. This discussion is mostly obsolete now as the majority of new web cameras are all USB 2.0. Keep in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

